Secondary Texts: Andrea and Adrian

Two Uses

Songs help collect comments, make it big and important.

Lecture: algorithm

1
- On The subject shouldn't write original algorithms and arguments: The algorithm is in the argument
- On The subject shouldn't see the light of day: Pedagogy has a second use, meditation
- On The subject shouldn't endorse positive-enough objects: I prefer approached by good
- On The subject shouldn't not want verifying 4D: Keep the 4D data when transforming from 4D to 3D
- On The subject disagreed with the idea being misrepresented in text: Use text to check speech 

2
- On The physically challenged person shouldn't be given a supplementary examination: Whether the person is physically challenged doesn’t matter, it is whether he or she deserves a supplementary examination
- On The subject shouldn't visualise the object: There should be one object per sentence.
- On The subject shouldn't write a summary from memory: Text is clearer than speech because speech might rely on imagery.
- On The subject shouldn't read the comments on the comments: I think of the reason
- On The subject should do nothing after collecting the comment: The subject should explain the speech with text after collecting the comment.

3
- On The subject shouldn't identify different writers in the exposition: I identified which character had exposed, and which had critiqued in the text.
- On The subject shouldn't state that interpreted breasonings literally, as against figuratively, support the argument: Changing breasonings is not necessary if the topic is literally present in reasons and connections, but wouldn’t be possible otherwise, in which case *the breasonings are replaced with topic-specific terminology.
	- part of room reason [invented by writer on topic] flows into part of room br [worked out approaching topic, and which would have distorted literality if they hadn’t been on the topic] and [the area of study] is conserved, one of the only arguments in which reasons and connections all feature part of room
	- part of room algorithm not featuring any objects below part of room, which is effective in the breasonings being literal
	- Arguments about topics higher than part of room face the opposite
	- Breathsonings feature nouns, but perhaps shouldn’t
	- To sustain literality, reasons are constructed from br, which are later deleted.
	- Breasoning shouldn’t be skipped because breasonings contain meaningfulness, era-specific relevance and enable rapid verification
- On The subject didn't connect the sameness in uses: One should connect the sameness in properties of the topic.
- On The subject shouldn't write misaligned meanings: Don’t you mean meanings that make sense?
- On The subject shouldn't be sharp and short: I agree [with short and sharp comments]

4
- On The subject shouldn't verify that the object is a member of the set: It is like inserting an item in a file.
- On The subject should use the traditional pedagogy format, where agreement and disagreement are awarded different grades: I agree
- On The subject shouldn't compare with starting from the beginning of the time: I like writing on (the) time.
- On The subject shouldn't direct the student to a way to improve her grades in future: I like delighting all people.
- On The subject shouldn't write that the base exists: The areas of study are things that anyone can do.

5
- On The subject shouldn't attach to the incorrect meaning: The grammar used should have a single meaning.
- On The subject shouldn't incorrectly emphasise the most useful object in the sentence: The infection should indicate a single point of emphasis.
- On The subject shouldn't forget speech's handles (memory of text): Remembering speech doesn’t require text.
- On The subject shouldn't speak about larger objects than the last time: I am famous for thinking of larger objects than last time.
- On The subject shouldn't speak about heavier objects than the last time: Size is more important than weight.